Friday, October 23, 2009
So the Pope starts working on a large door to allow for truckloads of Anglicans to come on in. Welcome, welcome, welcome. But whenever conversion talk starts going on, Cardinal Kasper always seems to be ashamed that conversions take place.
He says : “We are not fishing in the Anglican lake; proselytism is not the policy of the Catholic Church.
Well, it certainly seemed to be the policy of Our Lord. Something about "Come, follow me, and I will make you fishers of men." (for the politically sensitive, that includes women)
If Cardinal Kasper is head of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, how exactly does he expect "unity" if not by conversion? And why does he seem so ashamed of the Faith of which he's a Authorized Representative?
Source: Catholic News Service
Posted by Paul Nichols at 9:20 AM 22 comments:
Labels: Anglicans, Cardinal Kasper, Conversion, Pope Benedict XVI
Monday, October 12, 2009
RCIA in the Age of Obama
The Nobel Committee has officially sold their own prestige down the river with their preemptive awarding of the Peace prize to President Obama. Sheesh, if they wanted to honor an America-hating Peacenik, there are plenty of them who've done more than Obama, like maybe Tom Hayden, or Cindy Sheehan, or Jane Fonda.
Maybe the Committee is just trying to jump to the front of the line in the Obama Praise Department. Or, maybe they've just been watching too much MSNBC.
Posted by Paul Nichols at 10:33 AM 14 comments:
Labels: Nobel Peace Prize, Obama
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
The [Catholic] Supreme Court?
David Gibson over at Politics Daily has a good article exploring the fact that, with the opening of the new term, fully 66% of the Justices are Catholic. (For those of you who went to public schools, that's 6 out of 9).
There are plenty out there who see this as a bad thing. This crowd is made up of the usual suspects - the nominal Catholics, the fallen-away Catholics, more than a few radical protestants, and unbelievers in general. And, as can be expected, their arguments center on the Big Two - abortion and homosexuality.
While the article is even-handed, Mr. Gibson does get one thing wrong. He states that the justices decided a case involving capital punishment, and then claims that the decision clashed with Church teaching on the issue (inferring that the Church doesn't allow for capital punishment).
Posted by Paul Nichols at 11:41 AM 13 comments:
Labels: Supreme Court
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)